Legal Opinion

Keelan v. Belmont Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1946No. Civ. 14945PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

Plaintiff seeks the return to him of $10,000 held in escrow by the defendant title company as a partial payment of purchase price on an uncompleted purchase of real and personal property. The defendant Armour, as trustee, was the owner of an occupied, 90-unit apartment hotel, together with certain furniture, fixtures and equipment therein contained. Defendant Belmont Company was a realty broker, acting as selling agent for the owner. On April 27, 1944, an agreement was executed in the form of a “Deposit Receipt,” in which said Belmont Company acknowledged receipt from plaintiff Keelan of a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. L.A. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Amalgamated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Cross v. MayoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ballard v. MacCallumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API