Legal Opinion

Ballard v. MacCallum

California Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1940No. L. A. 16750PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an action by the administrators of the estate of William A. Ballard to cancel a trust created by decedent as trustor, and to obtain a reconveyance of the corpus of the estate. The trial court gave judgment for defendant and plaintiffs appealed. The appeal involves the interpretation of two instruments, one denominated a 1 ‘ contract of annuity for life” and the other a “declaration of trust”.

On January 14, 1935, decedent, then eighty-five years of age, executed the annuity contract under which he agreed to convey certain property to the California First National Bank of Long Beach as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ebbert v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Henck v. Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hawley v. KafitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Hopkins v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Straus v. North Hollywood Hospital, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Milenbach v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Palo and Dodini v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API