Legal Opinion

Bancroft v. Bancroft

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1918No. L. A. No. 5457. In BankPublishedCited by 54 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the defendant’s application for an order setting aside the interlocutory decree herein after an order sustaining, without leave to amend, the plaintiff’s demurrer to said application. The facts of the entire case embracing the particular grounds upon which said application was made and upon which it was demurred to and dismissed are set forth in the decision of the case of Bancroft v. Bancroft, ante, p. 359, [173 Pac. 579]. The main contention of the appellant upon this appeal is that the trial court has power, upon the motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Claudius v. MelvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Newell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Suttman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Reed v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Foster v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Prouty v. ProutyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Olson v. OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Dupont v. DupontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Remley v. RemleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API