Kegley v. Kegley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
Plaintiff and defendant were married in Los Angeles in 1921. Being unable tq live amicably as husband and wife, defendant suggested to plaintiff that a legal and valid divorce could be obtained through the courts of Mexico easily and without publicity. To this, plaintiff agreed, and they together called upon an attorney in Los Angeles, where plaintiff and defendant had continuously resided since their marriage, and directed this attorney to take the necessary steps to obtain such a divorce for them. Accordingly a petition for a divorce upon the ground of incompatibility was prepared and filed…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Rehfuss v. RehfussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Estate of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Howard v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Ungemach v. UngemachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.