Pico v. Cohn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
After a full consideration of the argument presented upon the rehearing in this cause, we are satisfied with the former decision, rendered on February 11, 1891; and for the reasons there given, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
The following is the decision above referred to, rendered in Bank on the 11th of February, 1891:—
Beatty, C. J.
This is a suit in equity to vacate and annul a final decree in another action between the same parties on the ground that it was procured by fraud. The superior court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and thereupon gave judgment for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Verplanck v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- In re Estate of GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Laithe v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by267 opinions
- W. Michael Kimes J. Colette Boykin v. Peter G. Stone, Judge, Superior Court Robert L. Mezzetti, II Henry Mariani Robert MacHadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Frost National Bank v. FernandezTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Peter C. Browning v. Jeff P. ProstokTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Alexander v. HagedornTexas Supreme Court · 1950
262 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.