Ackerman v. Michigan Central Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
About 4:30 p. m. of October 16, 1924, a clear, dry day, one of defendant’s trains collided with an automobile driven by Charles Gentinne, in which plaintiffs were riding and were injured. Defendant had judgment non obstante. The question is whether Charles Gentinne was guilty of contributory negligence.
Just west of Dearborn, three of defendant’s tracks cross Grindley Park avenue east and west. The north track is a passing track, the middle is the west-bound main line, and the south track the eastbound main line. The distance over all of the tracks is 38 feet, and between the tracks about 12…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McGee v. Consolidated Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Brady v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- West v. Detroit Terminal RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Downey v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
- McPeake v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lockett v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Richman v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Bishop v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Heintzelman v. Pennsylvania RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Rogers v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.