Lockett v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Caniff avenue in the city of Hamtramck runs east and west, and as .it approaches the city of Detroit from the east it traverses a crossing at which defendant has five parallel railroad tracks, running in a northerly and southerly direction. On each side of the crossing, in the center of Caniff avenue and 15 feet from the tracks, defendant has erected a large steel mast or post 12 feet in height, set in concrete foundation, with cross arms at the top to which are attached a series of lights. that flash red and show the word “stop” when a train is approaching. The lights flash only in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Crowley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. WindsorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Davis v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Grubb v. Illinois Terminal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Applegate v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1948
- Mallory v. PitcairnMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Bishop v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Benaway v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.