Legal Opinion

McPeake v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1928No. Docket No. 34PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWlEST, J.

Plaintiff Frank E. McPeake owned an automobile insured by plaintiff company, and, the evening of November 8, Í925, while attempting to cross defendant’s railroad tracks, in the city of Charlotte, the automobile was struck and damaged by a train backing over the crossing. The automobile was repaired at an expense of $643.12, the repair bill paid by the insurance company, and an assignment of McPeake’s right of action against defendant taken by that company. This suit was then brought by McPeake and. the insurance company to recover the damage to the automobile. During the trial McPeake was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tobias v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Heck v. HenneMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Crowley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. WindsorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  5. Davis v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bostrom v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Ilins v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Lockett v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bishop v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Benaway v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API