Legal Opinion

Heintzelman v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 28, Calendar No. 36,677PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

On August 31, 1930, Robert Heintzelman, plaintiff, was returning from a dance at Alpine, Michigan, in company with a young lady. In order to reach his farm home, he drove his old Model “T” Ford car through Grand Rapids, with whose streets he was not very familiar. Shortly after midnight he was driving in an easterly direction along the right or southerly side of Goodrich street, and had reached a point at which the street is traversed for a distance of 583 feet by a series of 27 tracks belonging to various railroads, and within a few blocks from the depot located on another street. After…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Richman v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Depotty v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Ackerman v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Stone v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mallory v. PitcairnMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Fitzcharles v. MayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Van Gilder v. C. & E. TRUCKING CORP.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Spenclay v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Rybarczyk v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API