Richman v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.
For upwards of four years, plaintiff resided on the Adams road near its intersection with Woodward avenue, in the village of Birmingham, Michigan. To enter the Adams road from Woodward avenue, one must cross five tracks of two rails each. The two most westerly tracks adjoin Woodward avenue and are exclusively for street railway purposes. The three more easterly ones belong to defendant, or other affiliated railroad companies. The easterly and westerly railroad tracks are used to set out cars and also to enable trains to pass one another. The railroad track between these latter two is used as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- McGee v. Consolidated Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Baker v. DelanoMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Brady v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Downey v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lockett v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Depotty v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Heintzelman v. Pennsylvania RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Rogers v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Tomczyk v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.