State v. Millner
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
Richard Eugene Millner appeals from a conviction of gross sexual imposition, claiming that he should have been allowed to withdraw his guilty plea. We reverse and remand.
Millner first pled not guilty, but later moved to change his plea to guilty. Mill-ner’s guilty plea was an Alford-type plea, 1 because Millner claimed that he was drunk at the time and did not remember the incident. The trial court accepted Millner’s guilty plea and set a date for sentencing.
On the date of sentencing, Millner, with new counsel, moved to withdraw his guilty plea. Millner claimed that his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Howard E. SaftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Paul A. RussellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Roberto Navarro-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Houle v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Froistad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. YostNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. KleinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. FeistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.