Legal Opinion

State v. Yost

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2018No. Nos. 20170358; 20170359; 20170360PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Dale Gene Yost appeals from an order denying his motion to withdraw guilty pleas and amended criminal judgments. Yost argues the district court abused its discretion in denying withdrawal of his guilty pleas, did not advise him of his rights before his pleas, and erred in amending the amended judgments because the district court lacked jurisdiction. Yost also argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the district court's denial of Yost's motion, vacate the district court's second amended judgment, and remand for correction of the first amended…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Allan C. MuganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Bernard H. Ellis, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Davies v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Kremer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. CraigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Olson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API