Legal Opinion

State v. Feist

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2006No. 20050152PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Douglas Feist appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a plea of guilty to possession of a pipe bomb in violation of N.D.C.C. § 62.1-05-01. Because the district court, in accepting Feist’s guilty plea, failed to substantially comply with the requirements of N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(c) and because the record demonstrates confusion over what sort of plea agreement or sentencing recommendation existed, we reverse the judgment and remand to the district court to permit Feist to withdraw his guilty plea.

I

[¶ 2] Feist and his friend, Andrew Greff, decided to make a bomb. In the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. United States v. Paul A. RussellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Roberto Navarro-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. David PunchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. State v. FarrellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sambursky v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. LiumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Kremer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. LiumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API