Legal Opinion

Pollock v. DR Horton, Inc.-Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 15, 2003No. 9903-02825; A110606PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment entered after the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on plaintiffs’ claims for breach of contract and on defendants’ counterclaims for breach of fiduciary duty, restitution, and breach of contract. We reverse.

Because the trial court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment, we state the facts in the record most favorably to plaintiffs, including drawing all reasonable inferences in their favor. ORCP 47 C; Flug v. University of Oregon, 335 Or 540, 542, 73 P3d 917 (2003); Jones v. General Motors Corp., 325 Or 404, 420, 939 P2d 608 (1997).…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Mills Acquisition Co. v. MacMillan, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  4. Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Best v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Venture Properties, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Veloz v. Foremost Ins. Co. Grand RapidsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2018
  3. Pistol Resources, LLC v. McNeelyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Great American Insurance v. LindermanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  5. Herron v. Wells Fargo Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API