Legal Opinion

Lasater v. Oakland Scavenger Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1945No. Civ. 12882PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro tem.

In this action for the wrongful death of a wife and mother the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff administrator in the sum of $14,000. The trial court denied a motion for new trial and defendants have appealed from the judgment.

It is not claimed on this appeal that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s finding of liability. The only grounds of appeal presented by appellants are that the amount of the judgment is excessive and that the court committed prejudicial error in refusing to give certain instructions proposed by appellants.

The decedent was 63 years…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Raymond v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Bechtold v. Bishop & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1940
  4. McNear v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Jones v. BayleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Warner v. Santa Catalina Island Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Jensen v. MinardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Borenkraut v. WhittenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API