Legal Opinion

Borenkraut v. Whitten

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1961No. L. A. No. 26324PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

In this action for personal injuries, judgment was entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendants, and plaintiff has appealed. She has also attempted to appeal from the order denying her motion for a new trial, which order is not appealable. The main ground of the appeal from the judgment is that the trial court committed prejudicial error in the giving and refusing of certain instructions.

The facts are as follows: Plaintiff’s automobile stalled, and was pushed to defendants’ service station. The engine would not start, although there was gasoline in the tank. An attendant (Harryman)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Warner v. Santa Catalina Island Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Hardin v. San Jose City Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Di Mare v. CresciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Self v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Gipson v. Davis Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API