Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARABIAN, J.
—In this case, we consider the distinction between “ordinary” and “professional” negligence and conclude that with respect to questions of substantive law they comprise essentially one form of action. Apart from statutory considerations, characterizing misfeasance as one type of negligence or the other generally only serves to define the standard of care applicable to the defendant’s conduct. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeal holding that the same alleged breach of duty can give rise to distinct causes of action for “ordinary” as well as…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lee Investment LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Delaney v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Samuels v. MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Papke v. HarbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.