Raymond v. Hill
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was brought by Lutie Raymond and her husband, Harry Raymond, to recover damages for injuries inflicted upon the former. The complaint charged that Lutie Raymond was injured by the negligent act of the defendant in carelessly and recklessly causing an automobile driven by himself to strike Lutie Raymond, inflicting upon her specified injuries for which compensation was sought. Trial was had before a jury, which brought in a verdict in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of two thousand dollars. Judgment followed. Defendant moved for a new trial, and from the order denying his motion and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Geiselman v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- Simeone v. LindsaySuperior Court of Delaware · 1907
- Gregory v. SlaughterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
3Cited by70 opinions
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Sheldon v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Bonebrake v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Jolley v. ClemensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.