Legal Opinion
McNear v. Pacific Greyhound Lines
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 24, 1944No. Civ. 12523PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
After a verdict for $8,200 for personal injuries the plaintiff made a motion for new trial limited to the issue of damages alone and the defendants moved for a new trial on all issues. The trial court denied defendants’ motion for new trial and granted a new trial limited to the issue of damages pursuant to .the plaintiff’s motion. From the order so made the defendants appeal.
Appellants argue that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict in two particulars: 1. That it fails as a matter of law to sustain a finding of appellants’ negligence; and 2. That it…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Raymond v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Buelke v. LevenstadtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Schuerholz v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Simon v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.