Legal Opinion

Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Watts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 23, 1938No. 6 Div. 241PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

Action by the plaintiff for compensation for herself and dependent children under the “Workmen’s Compensation Act”, Code 1923, § 7534 et seq., for the death of her husband, an employe of the defendant.

While technical rules as to pleading are not required in actions of this charter, the present complaint should have more accurately charged that the “Plaintiff’s intestate”, instead of the “plaintiff”, was employed, injured, etc., yet, considering the complaint in its entirety, the only reasonable meaning of same is that the plaintiff’s intestate, her husband, was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Radiator Co. v. AndinoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Hardisty v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Paramount Coal Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Hearn v. United States Cast Iron Pipe & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. KeefeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Baggett v. WebbCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  2. Nashville Bridge Co. v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ElliottCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  4. Aluminum Workers International v. ChampionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  5. C. E. Adams & Co. v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API