Legal Opinion

American Radiator Co. v. Andino

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 26, 1928No. 6 Div. 998PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotjldin, J.

Certiorari to review award of compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Code 1923, § 7534 et seq.).

Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the findings of fact by the trial judge are set out in the report of the case. The verified complaint under section 7578 alleges notice was given as per sections 7568 and 7569 of the Code. This means a notice in writing conforming to the requirements of those sections. No evidence' of such notice was offered. But the answer denied and put in issue the fact of knowledge, the alternative requirement of section 7578, and the evidence and finding of fact was directed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grimes v. Stith Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Van Treeck v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Murphy's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. State ex rel. City of Northfield v. District Court of Rice CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Allen v. City of MillvilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gulf States Steel Co. v. ChristisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Riley v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Nashville Bridge Co. v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. C. E. Adams & Co. v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API