Nashville Bridge Co. v. Honeycutt
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
Petition for writ of certiorari under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
The material averments of the petition and the decision of the trial court will constitute appropriate parts of the statement of facts.
The defendant offered no testimony. The trial court heard petitioner’s oral testimony and there was no written notice of injury given within ninety days thereof.
The decree, entered on October 26, 1944, contains a finding of facts and conclusions of law. It is appellant’s contention on this appeal that the finding of facts is not supported by the evidence and, accordingly,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Grimes v. Stith Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- De Zeng Standard Co. v. PresseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- O'Quinn v. AlstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Malbis Bakery Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bell v. DriskillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- BF Goodrich Company v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. DowneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Leach Manufacturing Company v. PuckettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. SteelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.