Legal Opinion

Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Keefe

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 5, 1928No. 6 Div. 23PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

This case has been before this court before, 216 Ala. 379, 113 So. 400, when the writ was awarded and the cause reversed and remanded for a failure on the part of the plaintiff to show notice or knowledge of the injury within ninety days as required by the statute. Upon the second trial the trial court found for the plaintiff and found that he had given the superintendent notice.

In this class of eases we have held that the finding of the trial court will not be disturbed when there is .evidence which will support the finding, meaning, of course, legal evidence. The trial court found that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Radiator Co. v. AndinoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. KeefeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gulf States Steel Co. v. ChristisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. C. E. Adams & Co. v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Legg v. AMERICOLD COMPRESSOR COMPANYCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. FooteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API