Hardisty v. Woodward Iron Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
That the death of the employee was “caused by an accident arising out of and in course of his employment” is a necessary condition to the right to compensation. When put in issue by answer, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff claiming compensation.
As appears from the foregoing statement of the case, the trial court gave a summary of the evidence on both sides relating to the controlling issue in the case, followed by his conclusion.
Appellant’s argument is directed largely to a discussion of the weight of the evidence. It misconceives the duty and function of the appellate court in this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Crosby v. Nunnally Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Crowder v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Ex Parte Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Bryant v. Central Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.