Legal Opinion

Hearn v. United States Cast Iron Pipe & Foundry Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 29, 1928No. 6 Div. 5PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

TMs is an action under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code 1923, §§ 7534-7597), instituted by the wife against the employer, the United States Cast Iron & Foundry Company, for compensation to herself and six dependent minor children, on account of the death of the plaintiff’s husband, Hddie Hearn, which, as the complaint avers, was caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. These averments are specifically, denied by the verified answer of the defendant.

The question of controversy on the trial, as appears from the record, certified in response to the writ of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Patterson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  4. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. La Veck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Grant v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  3. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Richardson Lumber Co. v. PoundersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Woodward Iron Co. v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API