Legal Opinion

Theurer v. Condon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1949No. 30582PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

This action was instituted by Carl Theurer and Ella C. Theurer, as plaintiffs, against R. B. Condon and Jane Doe Condon, sole traders doing business as Benjamin Franklin Electric Company and Good Housekeeping Shop. In their complaint, plaintiffs asked for judgment against defendants in the sum of $737.83, on account of damages to an apartment house owned by plaintiffs, the damages having been occasioned by a fire which, plaintiffs alleged, was proximately the result of defendants’ negligence in in stalling an oil supply tank and oil burning device in a range in one of the apartments located…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Genesee County Patrons Fire Relief Ass'n v. L. Sonneborn Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Doran v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Moore v. Dresden Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lindquist v. MullenWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ronald G. Forsyth v. Cessna Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Howe v. Pioneer Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Gevaart v. Metco Construction, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Kitchener v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API