Legal Opinion

Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1932PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinions were filed January 12, 1932:

Wickhem, J.

The principal contentions of the defendants are as follows: first, that there is no evidence of negligence on the part of the Tube Company in the manufacture of the tubes sold to the Marsh Company; second, that assuming such negligence to have been established, there is no evidence that it was the proximate cause of the injuries to plaintiffs; third, that there is no evidence to support the finding of the jury that the tube was defective; fourth, that the rule that a manufacturer who fails to exercise ordinary care to ascertain the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Wildman Mfg. Co. v. Davenport Hosiery MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Flies v. Fox Brothers Buick Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Lindemann v. RuskWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  5. Northridge Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API