Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinions were filed January 12, 1932:
Wickhem, J.
The principal contentions of the defendants are as follows: first, that there is no evidence of negligence on the part of the Tube Company in the manufacture of the tubes sold to the Marsh Company; second, that assuming such negligence to have been established, there is no evidence that it was the proximate cause of the injuries to plaintiffs; third, that there is no evidence to support the finding of the jury that the tube was defective; fourth, that the rule that a manufacturer who fails to exercise ordinary care to ascertain the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Wildman Mfg. Co. v. Davenport Hosiery MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Flies v. Fox Brothers Buick Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Lindemann v. RuskWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Northridge Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.