Ronald G. Forsyth v. Cessna Aircraft Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before KILKENNY and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and WOLLENBERG, District Judge.* KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents a classic example of the wilderness in which courts sometimes find themselves when searching for solutions to problems arising under the judicial nightmare known as Conflict of Laws.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
For the purposes of this appeal, the fundamental facts are undisputed. Appellant, a resident of the state of Washington, owned an airplane manufactured and sold by appellee in the state of Kansas in 1967. In January, 1972, appellant’s pilot flew the aircraft from Spokane…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Buchanan v. DoeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
- Waddoups v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Reed v. WiserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.