Lindquist v. Mullen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.
The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of dismissal.
Appellant contends the trial court erred in holding that her action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations. RCW 4.16.080(2) [cf. Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 159].
The action is predicated upon the negligence of a physician, who will be referred to herein as if he were the sole *676respondent. On February 1, 1946, he performed operations upon appellant’s gall bladder and hernia. He left a surgical sponge in the hernia incision, which prevented it from healing properly for over seven years.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cornell v. EdsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Theurer v. CondonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Doran v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- McCoy v. StevensWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Jones v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.