Lake Angelo Associates v. Township of White Lake
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals as of right the order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10) in this land use action. On appeal, plaintiff asserts that this action was sufficiently ripe to allow the trial court to adjudicate the merits. We affirm.
FACTS
Plaintiff owns eighty acres of land in White Lake Township that was formerly a sand and gravel mine. The mine was abandoned in the early 1960s and since then has been used by trespassers for dumping and off-road activities. Plaintiff acquired the property in 1979 with the expectation of developing the parcel into a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Electri-Tech, Inc. v. H F Campbell Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Weissman v. FruchtmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Paragon Properties Co. v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Keaton v. Village of Beverly HillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Jott, Inc v. Clinton Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Hendee v. Putnam TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Conlin v. SCIO TP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.