Legal Opinion

Hendee v. Putnam Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2010No. Docket 137446 and 137447PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

In this zoning case, Putnam Township (1) denied plaintiffs’ request to rezone a 144-acre parcel from agricultural-open space (A-O) use to single-family, rural residential (R-l-B) use, (2) denied a request for a planned unit development (PUD) that would have permitted R-l-B development of the parcel and, (3) denied a use variance that would have permitted residential development of up to 95 lots. In light of these circumstances, we consider whether the trial court had jurisdiction to entertain a claim of exclusionary zoning and grant relief that would allow plaintiffs to use the property for a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Odom v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of Darryl Houston Price v. Lori Jean KosmalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Peterson v. City of Grand RapidsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
  4. ANGLERS OF THE AuSABLE, INC v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. ANGLERS OF THE AuSABLE, INC v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API