Legal Opinion

Pennell v. City of San Jose

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1988No. 86-753PublishedCited by 590 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

This case involves a challenge to a rent control ordinance enacted by the city of San Jose, California, that allows a hearing officer to consider, among other factors, the “hardship to a tenant” when determining whether to approve a rent increase proposed by a landlord. Appellants Richard Pennell and the Tri-County Apartment House Owners Association sued in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County seeking a declaration that the ordinance, in particular the “tenant hardship” provisions, are “facially unconstitutional and therefore . . . illegal and void.” The Superior Court entered judgment on…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by590 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

585 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API