Legal Opinion
Paragon Properties Co. v. City of Novi
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 1996No. 100064, Calendar No. 4PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
Plaintiff Paragon Properties Company claims that the Novi zoning ordinance as applied to Paragon’s property effected an unconstitutional taking. This claim requires examination of whether the Novi City Council’s denial of Paragon’s request to rezone its property was a final decision appealable to the circuit court. We find it was not, and that Paragon’s constitutional claim is not ripe for review. The Court of Appeals is affirmed.
i
Paragon Properties purchased a seventy-five acre parcel in 1980 for $150,000. The property was vacant, unimproved, and not served by city water or sewer. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- People v. AbrahamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Chelsea Investment Group LLC v. City of ChelseaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Frericks v. Highland TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Dorman v. Township of ClintonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Sun Communities v. Leroy TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.