Legal Opinion
Jott, Inc v. Clinton Charter Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 8, 1997No. Docket 173879, 181802PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
These consolidated appeals involve plaintiffs attempt to offer “topless” entertainment in Clinton Charter Township. In Docket No. 173879, plaintiff, Jott, Inc., appeals by right an order declaring Clinton Township Zoning Ordinance 260 (restricting certain “adult uses” to districts zoned “b-3” general business use) constitutional and enjoining plaintiff from providing “adult entertainment” contrary to the ordinance. Plaintiff also challenges the trial court’s decision upholding a 1984 covenant in which plaintiff agreed not to offer topless entertainment in Clinton Township. In Docket No.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hanneman v. Continental Western Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Yankee Springs Township v. FoxMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Van Buren Charter Township v. Garter Belt, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Malecon Tobacco, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Department of TaxationNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Bronco's Entertainment, Ltd. v. Charter Township Of Van BurenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.