Legal Opinion

Keaton v. Village of Beverly Hills

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1993No. Docket 141587PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMichael J. Kelly, P.J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from a decision of the circuit court denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary disposition and dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint seeking a writ of mandamus to force defendant, Village of Beverly Hills, to grant a split of a parcel of land owned by plaintiffs. We affirm.

The essential facts are not in dispute. Plaintiffs are the owners of Lot 67, Cranbrook Woods Subdivision No. 1, in the Village of Beverly Hills, Michigan. Plaintiffs’ personal residence is located on the west side of the lot. Plaintiffs desired to divide their lot into two separate parcels. Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Toan v. McGinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. MacEnas v. Village of MichianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Delly v. Bureau of State LotteryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Trojan v. Township of TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Carlson v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hanlin v. Saugatuck TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Dowerk v. Oxford Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. W a Foote Memorial Hospital v. Department of Public HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. White-Bey v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. McKeighan v. Grass Lake Township SupervisorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API