Legal Opinion
Ewalt v. Mortgage Securities, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1933No. Docket No. 4726PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
The plaintiff brought suit under the provisions of the Usury Law of California to recover treble the alleged amount of interest which she was compelled to pay for a loan of money according to the terms of a promissory note. Judgment was rendered against her upon findings which declare that the challenged note was evidence of only a portion of a larger indebtedness incurred as a part of the same transaction which was not usurious as a whole. From this judgment the plaintiff has appealed.
The appellant and Otis L. Griffin purchased the Chrysler Garage at Santa Barbara. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Douglass v. Boulevard Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Van Noy v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Baker v. ButcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Abbot v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Knoll v. SchleussnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Goldenzwig v. ShaddockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Mathis v. Holland Furnace Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1946
- Orlando v. BernsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.