Orlando v. Berns
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Of the issues discussed by the parties upon this appeal two are crucial: (1) Was this a loan transaction? (2) If so, was it a usurious loan?
The principal undisputed facts are as follows: During the period 1947-1950 plaintiff had been improving certain of his real property. By July, 1950, he had become indebted in the sum of $178,150.48 and was in imminent danger of losing the property and improvements by foreclosure or forced sale. He encountered difficulty in getting a loan to liquidate his debts and sought the assistance of defendant Herman Berns. Their negotiations…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Wood v. Angeles Mesa Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Ewalt v. Mortgage Securities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
- Kjar v. BrimleyUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Metcalf v. BartrandAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Robinson v. DurstonNevada Supreme Court · 1967
- Cowles v. ZlaketCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.