Legal Opinion

Knoll v. Schleussner

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1952No. Civ. 18970PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.

By the instant action in usury, plaintiffs sought treble damages and injunctive relief. Their complaint alleges that on March 10, 1950, defendants agreed to lend them $4,000, and as security therefor required them to execute a note and trust deed covering real property owned by them. In addition, defendants “demanded as a bonus for said loan” that plaintiffs agree to build a child’s playground and tennis court on defendants’ property, and to provide a caterpillar tractor and the necessary labor and materials to complete them.

Plaintiffs received $3,500 from defendants and in April o£ 1950,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sharp v. Mortgage Security Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. O. A. Graybeal Co. v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Ewalt v. Mortgage Securities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Goldenzwig v. ShaddockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boerner v. Colwell Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Abbot v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Pease v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  4. George Jue v. Irving I. Bass, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Brocke v. NaseathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API