Legal Opinion
Goldenzwig v. Shaddock
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1939No. Civ. No. 12160PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants predicated upon the granting of defendants’ motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury (sec. 629, Code Civ. Proc.) in favor of plaintiffs in an action to have certain payments of money to defendants by plaintiffs declared to be usurious.
The material facts are:
August 15, 1928, plaintiffs borrowed from defendant Yetta Shaddock and her husband, Benjamin Medoff (now deceased), *721$16,500 and gave as security therefor two notes secured by a mortgage on real property. One note dated August 15, 1928, for $12,500 was due three…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sharp v. Mortgage Security Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- O. A. Graybeal Co. v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Ewalt v. Mortgage Securities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Abbot v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Shirley v. BrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- George Jue v. Irving I. Bass, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Knoll v. SchleussnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Cambridge Development Co. v. U. S. FinancialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.