Legal Opinion

Abbot v. Stevens

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 1955No. Civ. 20570PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. pro tem. *

Demurrer to plaintiffs’ fourth amended complaint having been sustained, they, according to appellants’ opening brief, “refused to plead further.” The judgment recites that counsel for plaintiffs stated “that plaintiffs had either pleaded a good cause of action or could not plead one.” Plaintiffs having appealed, their counsel say that the “sole question to be decided therefore is whether said pleading as amended states a cause of action.” They treat the action as one for damages for fraud and for recovery of interest, bonus and penalty for usury.

The complaint alleges…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. PendergrassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Gold v. Los Angeles Democratic LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Southwest Concrete Products v. Gosh Construction Corp.California Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wallis v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Union Bank v. KrugerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API