Legal Opinion

Arista Records LLC v. John Does 1-19

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 28, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1649(CKK)PublishedCited by 516 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

This is a copyright infringement case in which Plaintiffs, ten music and recording entities, allege that nineteen unidentified “John Doe” Defendants infringed their copyrighted recordings by downloading and/or distributing the recordings using an online media distribution system. 1 Simultaneous with the filing of their Complaint, Plaintiffs filed an ex parte Motion for Leave to Take Immediate Discovery by serving a subpoena on non-party Internet Service Provider, The George Washington University (“GW”), to obtain identifying information…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40District Court, S.D. New York · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by516 opinions

  1. St. Louis Group, Inc. v. Metals & Additives Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
  2. Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Arista Records LLC v. DOES 1-4District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
  4. First Time Videos, LLC v. Does 1-500District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  5. Ibarra v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011

511 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API