Legal Opinion
Ibarra v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 28, 2011No. 10 C 4450PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge.
John Ibarra brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3) against the City of Chicago, Officers Michael Hill-man and Daniel McDonald, Sergeants Shawn Joyce and Barbara Sydel, and John and Jane Doe Officers and Supervisors, (collectively, “Chicago Police Defendants”), and Matthew Pritzker, alleging that the Chicago Police Defendants violated his constitutional rights. (R. 23, Am. Compl.) Currently pending before the Court are the Chicago Police Defendants’ motion to dismiss Counts I, II, III, IV, and VI of Ibarra’s…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Grocery Manufacturers Ass'n v. SorrellDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2015
- Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. DoeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Bicycle Peddler, LLC v. Does 1-12District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Aon plc v. Infinite Equity, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Arthur L. Lewis, Jr., et al. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.