Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIN, District Judge.
In this case, plaintiffs — seventeen record companies — sued forty unidentified “Doe” defendants for copyright infringement, alleging that defendants illegally downloaded and distributed plaintiffs’ copyrighted or exclusively licensed songs from the Internet, using a “peer to peer” file copying network. Plaintiffs served a subpoena on non-party Internet service provider Ca-blevision Systems Corporation (“Cablevision”), seeking to obtain defendants’ identities. Four defendants move to quash the subpoena.
The motions present two First Amendment issues. First, is a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,403 opinions
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- K-Beech, Inc. v. John Does 1-37District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. John Doe Nos. 1-30District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Arista Records LLC v. John Does 1-19District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Rotten Records, Inc. v. DoeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
1,398 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.