Legal Opinion

Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 26, 2004No. 04 CIV. 473(DC)PublishedCited by 1,403 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHIN, District Judge.

In this case, plaintiffs — seventeen record companies — sued forty unidentified “Doe” defendants for copyright infringement, alleging that defendants illegally downloaded and distributed plaintiffs’ copyrighted or exclusively licensed songs from the Internet, using a “peer to peer” file copying network. Plaintiffs served a subpoena on non-party Internet service provider Ca-blevision Systems Corporation (“Cablevision”), seeking to obtain defendants’ identities. Four defendants move to quash the subpoena.

The motions present two First Amendment issues. First, is a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,403 opinions

  1. Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. K-Beech, Inc. v. John Does 1-37District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  3. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. John Doe Nos. 1-30District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  4. Arista Records LLC v. John Does 1-19District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Rotten Records, Inc. v. DoeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015

1,398 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API