Legal Opinion
Dealmeida v. M.C.M. Stamping Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 10, 1992No. 10977PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendants appeal from a decision of the compensation review division (review division) of the workers’ compensation commission. The review division affirmed the finding and award of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) as well as his denial of the defendants’ motion to vacate. On appeal, the defendants assert that the review division incorrectly (1) affirmed the finding and award when the commissioner failed to hold an evidentiary hearing to require the plaintiff to establish the causation of the plaintiff’s injuries and (2) affirmed the commis*443sioner’s denial of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Winchester Woods Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Jett v. DunlapSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Perille v. Raybestos-Manhattan-Europe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Family Financial Services, Inc. v. SpencerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Black v. London & Egazarian Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Toro v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Anderson v. SchiefferConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.