Legal Opinion

Toro v. City of Stamford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 10, 2004No. SC 17050PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*534 Opinion

KATZ, J.

The sole issue in this certified appeal1 is whether the compensability of a particular injury, under the Workers’ Compensation Act (act); General Statutes § 31-275 et seq.; implicates the subject matter jurisdiction of a workers’ compensation commissioner. The defendants, the city of Stamford (city) and its workers’ compensation provider, Connecticut Interlocal Risk Management Agency, appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court ordering summary affirmance of the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board), which had affirmed the decision of the workers’…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Menzies v. FisherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Thomas v. Department of Developmental ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API