Legal Opinion
Black v. London & Egazarian Associates, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 9, 1993No. 10994PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a decision of the compensation review division (review division) of the workers’ compensation commission. The review division affirmed the dismissal of the claim on its merits by the workers’ compensation commissioner. Earlier in the course of the proceedings, the review division had affirmed the commissioner’s denial of the plaintiffs motion to preclude. On appeal, the plaintiff asserts that the review division had incorrectly (1) affirmed the commissioner’s ruling that the notice of claim was not served personally or by registered or certified mail in accordance…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Perille v. Raybestos-Manhattan-Europe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Hansen v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sharp v. Wyatt, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Chute v. Mobil Shipping & Transportation Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Funaioli v. City of New LondonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Foti v. RichardsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.