Legal Opinion
Perille v. Raybestos-Manhattan-Europe, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 25, 1985No. 12163PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
This appeal arises from an action brought by the plaintiff, Samuel R. Perille, against both his former employer, RaybestosManhattan-Europe, Inc. (Raybestos), and a former coworker, Joseph Tighe. Specifically, the plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s determination on Raybestos’ motion for summary judgment that the Connecticut Workers’ Compensation Act bars this action against his former employer. See General Statutes § 31-284 (a).
The plaintiff had been employed with Raybestos at its Stratford facility for a number of years prior to his voluntary resignation in September, 1980. In 1978,…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Mandolidis v. Elkins Industries, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hayden v. Smithville Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Nolan v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.