Legal Opinion
Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 18, 2008No. SC 17844PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The dispositive issue in this workers’ compensation appeal is whether an employer that is deemed “conclusively presumed to have accepted the compensability of the alleged injury” under General Statutes § 31-294c (b) 2 because of its failure to contest liability or commence payment of compensation within the time period prescribed is permitted to contest the extent of the claimant’s disability from that alleged injury. The plaintiff, David Haipaz, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- GEORGE J. v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Thomas v. Department of Developmental ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Butts v. BysiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- McCoy v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Heim v. Zoning Board of Appeals of New CanaanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.