Legal Opinion

Curby v. Mastenbrook

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1939No. Docket No. 14, Calendar No. 40,248PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

Plaintiff Sophie Curby and her husband, Meddie Curby, were the owners of a Ford car, certificate of title to which was held in their joint names. They also owned a trailer jointly. On August 23, 1937, they went together to defendants’ place of business in Muskegon, Michigan, with the view of exchanging their car and trailer for a better used car. Defendants conducted a secondhand automobile business on a lot, on the rear of which was a building where repairs were made. Plaintiff and her husband were shown a number of ears. Plaintiff testified that one of the defendants in referring to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Flies v. Fox Brothers Buick Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Grinnell v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Murphy v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Yacobian v. VartanianMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Sylvester Hansen v. Firestone Tire and Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  3. Bahlman v. Hudson Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Groening v. OpsataMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Boos v. ClaudeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API