Legal Opinion

Flies v. Fox Brothers Buick Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1928PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed. April 3, 1928:

Owen, J.

Liability of the Fox Brothers Buick Company is predicated upon the fact that after the car had been in a wreck and greatly damaged the Fox Brothers obtained title to it, took it into their garage, and repaired or rebuilt it so as to restore it to a usable condition, and that when they sold the car to Johnson the brakes were inefficient, in which condition the automobile constituted an instrumentality that was imminently dangerous to life- and limb, because of which the Fox Brothers Buick Company became liable to persons sustaining injury…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  3. Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. Wellington v. Downer Kerosene Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Matthews v. Lawnlite CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Johnson v. HeintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API